<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>R3R &#124; a Marketing technology agency in San Francisco &#187; openx</title> <atom:link href="http://r3r.com/blog/topics/openx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://r3r.com</link> <description>San Francisco marketing technologists</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>OpenX Has Me Looking at Google Like Big Brother</title><link>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/openx-vs-google-ad-manager/</link> <comments>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/openx-vs-google-ad-manager/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:27:50 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy Reither</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Promote]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google ad manager]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google apps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[openx]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.reitherco.com/2008/04/01/openx-vs-google-ad-manager/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m generally a big fan of Google&#8217;s small business product offerings. Not only because of their very reasonable price tags (i.e.: free or cheap) but because the services themselves are just plain good. See: Google Analytics and Google Apps as two great examples. So, naturally I was excited when Google announced their new Ad Manager [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
class="alignright" src="http://www.openx.org/sites/all/themes/openx2/images/logo_openx.png" alt="" />I&#8217;m generally a big fan of Google&#8217;s small business product offerings. Not only because of their very reasonable price tags (i.e.: free or cheap) but because the services themselves are just plain good. See: <a
href="http://www.google.com/analytics/" target="_blank">Google Analytics</a> and <a
href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/business/index.html" target="_blank">Google Apps</a> as two great examples. So, naturally I was excited when Google announced their new <a
href="https://www.google.com/admanager/" target="_blank">Ad Manager</a> (a free service which will allow website managers to track and rotate their sites&#8217; ads). But Google is entering yet another market niche, which has the players in that niche just a little tense.<span
id="more-124"></span></p><p>OpenX (previously OpenAds), developers of another popular free ad server, <a
href="http://blog.openx.org/03/why-should-ad-serving-be-open/" target="_blank">recently made their concerns known</a>. But in doing so they cleverly painted a picture of Google as <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_%281984%29" target="_blank">Big Brother</a>&#8230;placing doubt in the minds of readers about Google&#8217;s master plan. Normally I shrug this kind of stuff off, but their point resonated with me. It is in Google&#8217;s best interest to determine what margins are being earned on their web publishers&#8217; properties &#8211; and reduce that margin to the lowest the market will bear.</p><p>Did it stop me from signing up for a test drive of Google Ad Manager? No. But will I think twice before managing all my ads with a Google product? Absolutely.</p><p>Side note: As <a
href="http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2007/03/29/will-free-ad-serving-from-google-win/" target="_blank">conversionrater.com accurately points out</a>, free has its price, and some businesses are looking for more than just a low price point. And just as Google Analytics shook up the analytics world (didn&#8217;t kill it, like some expected), Ad Manager will probably do the same. Competition can be a very good thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/openx-vs-google-ad-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Business Website Cost (Part 6): Other Cost Variables</title><link>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/business-website-part-6-other-cost-variables/</link> <comments>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/business-website-part-6-other-cost-variables/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:40:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jeremy Reither</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Build]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google adsense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[openx]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.reitherco.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-6-other-cost-variables/</guid> <description><![CDATA[&#60;&#60; Business Website Cost (Part 5): The Backbone of Your Site Additional Factors to Consider that May Affect the Cost of Your Website Project: by flickr.com/sgw Number of Pages:  An easy way to measure the size of a website &#8211; which is closely related to cost of production &#8211; is the number of pages. Consider [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-5-the-backbone-of-your-site/">&lt;&lt; Business Website Cost (Part 5): The Backbone of Your Site</a></strong><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Additional Factors to Consider that May Affect the Cost of Your Website Project:</strong></p><dl
id="attachment_2869" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 176px;"><dt
class="wp-caption-dt"><img
class="size-full wp-image-2869 " style="margin: 3px; border: 0px;" title="Cost Variables" src="http://r3r.com/wp-content/uploads//2008/02/cost-variables.jpg" alt="by flickr.com/sgw" width="166" height="250" /></dt><dd
class="wp-caption-dd">by flickr.com/sgw</dd></dl><ul><li><strong>Number of Pages:</strong>  An easy way to measure the size of a website &#8211; which is closely related to cost of production &#8211; is the number of pages. Consider that many of your website&#8217;s pages may utilize the same design, so while your website may have 20 pages, maybe 15 of them share the same design, leaving you with 5 unique page layouts (this is how many layouts your graphic designer will have to create, and her pricing should be tied to this number (more pages = more cost)). </li><li><strong>Branding / Identity: </strong>If you want your website to be an extension of your offline marking and branding, a graphic designer will be needed. A website that doesn&#8217;t reflect the brand you&#8217;ve worked to build offline will do you little good in terms of brand recognition. Expect to spend $200 to $2,000 on a logo alone. If you have no pre-existing offline brand, you have more latitude in creating your new online brand, and can save some money by keeping it simple. If that&#8217;s the case, consider working with one of the popular <a
href="http://r3r.com/2007/06/30/creating-a-logo-without-breaking-the-bank/">budget logo design shops</a>. Your may also consider hiring a designer through <a
href="http://www.elance.com/" target="_blank">Elance</a>, or working directly with a local provider &#8211; but either way be sure to check portfolios. Not all graphic designers are logo / identity specialists.</li></ul><p><span
id="more-103"></span></p><ul><li><strong>Shopping Cart: </strong>This is a must-have feature for e-commerce sites. There are dozens of options available, in all different price ranges. From $40/month hosted subscriptions (Yahoo!) to $750 one-time purchase solutions (X-Cart Gold) and up. Keep in mind that if you&#8217;re going to take credit cards for payment, you&#8217;ll need to have a merchant account as well (which will charge you a percentage of each purchase &#8211; usually 1% &#8211; 4%). This isn&#8217;t an endorsement of GoECart, since I have never used their product, but they do have a page listing <a
href="http://www.goecart.com/shopping_cart_software_comparison.asp" target="_blank">most of the major shopping cart vendors</a>. Take their feature comparisons with a grain of salt (they <em>might</em> be biased toward their own product).</li><li><strong>Ads / Ad Serving: </strong>Is your site going to generate revenue from advertisements? If you&#8217;re going to use display ads (also called banner ads) you&#8217;ll need to make use of a &#8220;banner manager&#8221; or &#8220;ad server.&#8221; Most CMS systems, as well as WordPress come with (or can be easily modified to have) basic banner management capability (which track ad clicks and rotate banners). Remember, though, in order to earn ad revenue you have to have significant site traffic&#8230;something that most new sites do not have off the bat. Your best bet is to use <a
href="http://www.google.com/adsense" target="_blank">Google AdSense</a> as your sole ad provider until you start to see checks coming in. At that point you may be able to earn more by working directly with advertisers. If you then need more advanced ad serving capability you can consider installing <a
href="http://www.openx.org/" target="_blank">OpenX</a> (previously OpenAds, previously PHPAdsNew) &#8211; an open source ad server which is free to download, but will cost you some time and/or labor dollars to install.</li><li><strong>Analytics / Statistics: </strong>One great thing about the web is that it&#8217;s the most trackable and measurable media there is. Savvy website owners take advantage of this and track the &#8220;statistics&#8221; of their website, to find out things like:<ul><li>What are people searching for when they find your website</li><li>Which other websites are directing people to your website</li><li>What are the most popular pages of your website</li></ul></li></ul><blockquote><p>Answers to these questions can help you gain valuable insight into your customers&#8217; mindset. And the good news is that there is a great free analytics solution available from Google (<a
href="http://www.google.com/analytics/" target="_blank">Google Analytics</a>). Someone will charge you for installing the analytics code on your website, but it shouldn&#8217;t take more than a couple hours.</p></blockquote><ul><li>Other more robust analytics solutions are plenty, but are generally not justified by small business websites. In fact, the other analytics solutions can be complex to the point of requiring a part time dedicated resource just to make use of them. But here are a few other reputable names ($150/month and up):<ul><li><a
href="http://www.webtrends.com/" target="_blank">Webtrends</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.omniture.com/" target="_blank">Omniture</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.clicktracks.com/" target="_blank">ClickTracks</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.indextools.com/" target="_blank">Indextools</a></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Next: <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-7-form-vs-function/">Business Website Cost (Part 7): Form vs. Function</a></strong></p><p><strong>Pages: <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-1-introduction/">1</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-2-figuring-your-budget/">2</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-3-in-house-vs-outsourced-development/">3</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-4-remote-vs-local-talent/">4</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-5-the-backbone-of-your-site/">5</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-6-other-cost-variables/">6</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-7-form-vs-function/">7</a>, <a
href="http://r3r.com/2008/02/21/business-website-part-8-miscellaneous-services-and-wrap-up/">8</a></strong></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://r3r.com/blog/2008/business-website-part-6-other-cost-variables/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/33 queries in 0.249 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: r3r.com @ 2012-02-07 00:30:43 -->
